Border divergence or convergence in the context of integration: A case study of the Russian-Belarusian and Russian-Kazakhstan borderlands
Abstract
A state level integration process should first and foremost have a positive impact on the border areas. The current Russian-Belarusian and Russian-Kazakhstan borders acquired the status of ‘state borders’ in 1991 as a result of the collapse of the Soviet Union. While Russia and Belarus immediately embarked on the path of integration in the 1990s, effectively cancelling border controls, Russia and Kazakhstan were forced to resolve border security issues by strengthening their border and establishing customs control processes. The launch of the Customs Union in 2010 partially removed the existing trade contradictions, and the creation of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in 2015 significantly strengthened interstate interactions. However, despite the declared integration, it could not compensate for the dividing role of the border which separates the diverging political, legal, and economic spaces of the three countries. The purpose of this study is to determine whether divergence or convergence occurs in the considered border regions, as seen through the prism of demographic, ethno-cultural and economic changes. We rely on the results of a multi-year field research in various regions of the Russian-Belarusian and Russian-Kazakhstan borderland (2014–2018), data from official statistics, and some conclusions based on the authors’ findings as part of their work on previous collective research projects. We found out that demographic processes became one of the reasons, as well as the main driver of divergence. The active depopulation evidently decreased the potential for cross-border cooperation (especially at the local level). The Russian-Belarusian borderland is still rather homogeneous in sociocultural sense, and the border between Russia and Kazakhstan is characterized by an increase in ethno-cultural divergence. The post-Soviet period of nation-building in Kazakhstan was a period of the revival of the national language and kazakhization of the public space. Our analysis demonstrates the crucial importance of path dependence in the economic cooperation on the whole and in the specialization of interregional interactions. We observed both autonomization and absence of cross-border cohesion in the economic sphere, and in many cases, we saw examples of competition.
References
Barthel, M. 2017. Milking the border - cohesive strategies in respond to the crisis of the periphery in border regions. In Cross-border Review Yearbook 2016. European Crisis and its Consequences for Borders and Cooperation. Ed.: Scott, J.W., Budapest, CESCI, 47-84.
Benedek, J. and Moldovan, A. 2015. Economic convergence and polarisation: towards a multi-dimensional approach. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64.(3): 187-203. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.3
Bremmer, I. 1994. Nazarbaev and the North: State‐building and ethnic relations in Kazakhstan. Ethnic and Racial Studies 17. (4): 619-635. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.1994.9993843
Bremmer, I. and Welt, C. 1996. The trouble with democracy in Kazakhstan. Central Asian Survey 15. (2): 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634939608400944
Bufon, M. 2006. Between social and spatial convergence and divergence: an exploration into the political geography of European contact areas. GeoJournal 66. 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-006-9008-1
Cartone, A., Postiglione, P. and Hewings, G.J.D. 2021. Does economic convergence hold? A spatial quantile analysis on European regions. Economic Modelling 95. 408-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.03.008
Čelan, T.J. 2016. An analysis of the latest trends of the complex development of the Croatian-Hungarian border area. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 65. (1): 43-56. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.65.1.4
Czerewacz-Filipowicz, K. and Konopelko, A. 2017. Regional Integration Processes in the Commonwealth of Independent States. Cham, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47563-9
Davenel, Y.-M. 2012. Cultural mobilization in post-Soviet Kazakhstan: views from the state and from non-titular nationalities compared. Central Asian Survey 31. (1): 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2012.649583
Fedorov, G.M. and Mikhaylov, A.S. 2018. Regional divergence dynamics in the Baltic region: towards polarization and equalization. Geographia Polonica 91. (4): 399-411. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0127
Fedorov, G.M., Druzhinin, A.G. and Katrovskij A.P. 2020. Zapadnoe Porubezh'e Rossii: Modelirovanie Razvitiya i Obespechenie Ekonomicheskoj Bezopasnosti. Monografiya (Western frontier of Russia: Modelling of development and provision of economic security. Monography). Kaliningrad, Baltic Federal University Immanuel Kant.
Gerasimenko, T.I. 2020. Main factors in the transformation of regional and ethnic identity. South of Russia Ecology Development 15. (3): 144-154. https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2020-3-144-154
Golunov, S.V. 2005. Rossijsko-Kazahstanskaya Granica: Problemy Bezopasnosti i Mezhdunarodnogo Sotrudnichestva (Russian-Kazakh border: problems of security and international cooperation). Volgograd, Publishing House of Volgograd State University.
Gorbachev, O. and Lin, D. 2013. Demograficheskoe Razvitie Rossijsko-Belorusskogo Pogranich'ya v Usloviyah Urbanizacii (seredina XX-nachalo XXI v.). (Demographic development of the Russian-Belarusian borderlands in the context of urbanization [mid-20th-early 21st centuries]). Moscow, Knorus.
Grigorieva, R. 2020. Identichnosti molodezhi na prigranichnyh territoriyah Belarusi i Rossii (Identities of youth in the border areas of Belarus and Russia). Bulletin of Anthropology 2. (50): 225-240.
Herkenrath, M., König, C., Scholtz, H. and Volken, T. 2005. Convergence and divergence in the contemporary world system: An introduction. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 46. (5-6): 363-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715205060227
Kadyrzhanov, R. 2009. Vybor alfavita - vybor identichnosti (Choosing an alphabet - choosing an identity). News of the National Academy of Sciences. Social Science Series 5. 97-110.
Kadyrzhanov, R.K. 2014. Etnokul'turnyj Simvolizm i Nacional'naya Identichnost' Kazahstana (Ethnocultural symbolism and national identity of Kazakhstan). Almaty, Institute of Philosophy, Politics and Region Studies KN MON RK.
Kaiser, R. and Chinn, J. 1995. Russian-Kazakh relations in Kazakhstan. Post-Soviet Geography 36. (5): 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10605851.1995.10640992
Karpenko, M.S. 2019. Prigranichnoe izmerenie evrazijskoj integracii Rossii i Kazahstana: vyzovy dlya sotrudnichestva (Cross-border dimension of the Eurasian integration of Russia and Kazakhstan: challenges for cooperation). In Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Series Geographic 1. Moscow, Russian Academy of Sciences, 24-36. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587-55662019124-36
Katrovsky, A.P. 2015 Tendencii i problemy razvitiya prigranichnyh s Belorussiej regionov Rossii (Trends and problems of border development with Belarus and Russian regions). Izvestia of Smolensk State University 2- 1. 30. 148-158.
Kolosov, V. and Morachevskaya, K. 2020. The role of an open border in the development of peripheral border regions: The case of Russian-Belarusian borderland. Journal of Borderlands Studies 35. ePublication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2020.1806095
Kolossov, V. and Scott, J. 2013. Selected conceptual issues in border studies. Belgeo 1. ePublication. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.10532
Kolosov, V.A. and Sebentsov, A.B. 2020. Russian borderlands: Contemporary problems and challenges. Regional Science Policy & Practice 4. (12): 671-687. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12285
Kolossov, V.A, Vendina, O.I., Zotova, M.V., Sebentsov, A.B. and Gritsenko, A. 2018. Rossijskoe Pogranich'e: Vyzovy Sosedstva (Russian borderlands: challenges of neighbourhood). Moscow, IP Matushkina I.I.
Lang, T. 2015. Socio-economic and political responses to regional polarisation and socio-spatial peripheralisation in Central and Eastern Europe: a research agenda. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64. (3): 171-185. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.2
Lebedeva, N. 1995. Novaya Russkaya Diaspora: Social'no-psihologicheskij Analiz (New Russian diaspora: socio-psychological analysis). Moscow, N.N. Miklukho-Maklai Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology. RAS.
Limonov, L. et al. 2012. Analiz torgovo-proizvodstvennyh svjazej prigranichnyh regionov Rossii i Kazahstana: vlijanie Tamozhennogo sojuza i edinogo jekonomicheskogo prostranstva (Analysis of trade and production relations of the border regions of Russia and Kazakhstan: the impact of the Customs Union and a single economic space). Eurasian Economic Integration 4. (17): 32-57.
Lipshitz, G. 1992. Divergence versus convergence in regional development. Journal of Planning Literature 7. (2): 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229200700201
Máliková, L., Farrell, M. and McDonagh, J. 2016. Perception of marginality and peripherality in an Irish rural context. Quaestiones Geographicae 35. (4): 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0037
Manakov, A. 2016. Depopulyacionnye processy v Pskovskoj oblasti na fone polyarizacii naseleniya Severo-Zapadnoj Rossii (Depopulation processes in the Pskov region against the background of the polarization of the population of North-West Russia). Questions of Geography 141. 317-337.
Mkrtchyan, N. 2002. Etnicheskaya struktura migracionnyh potokov iz Central'noj Azii v rossijskoe prigranich'e (Ethnic structure of migration flows from Central Asia to the Russian borderland). Russia-Kazakhstan: Frontier Migration 1. 52-64.
Morachevskaya, K.A., Shavel', A.N. and Zinovyev, A.S. 2018. Shifts in the foreign trade of border regions of Russia and Belarus in the context of political and economic challenges of the 2010s. Regional Research of Russia 8. (3): 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970518030061
Nikitenko, P. and Vertinskaya, T. 2006. Belorussko-rossijskoe prigranichnoe sotrudnichestvo kak faktor formirovaniya Soyuznogo gosudarstva Belarusi i Rossii (Belarusian-Russian cross-border cooperation as a factor in the formation of the Union State of Belarus and Russia). Society and Economics 3. 86-99.
Paasi, A. 2009. Political boundaries. International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography 8. 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00793-8
Petrenko, E. 2011. Uchebnik Istorii kak Instrument Formirovaniya Nacional'noj Identichnosti na Postsovetskom Prostranstve: opyt Kazahstana (History textbook as a tool for the formation of national identity in the post-Soviet space: the experience of Kazakhstan). Perm, Perm University Bulletin Series: Political Science 2. Perm, University of Perm.
Posokhin, I. 2019. Soft Belarusization: (re)building of identity or "border reinforcement"? Colloquia Humanistica 8. 58-78. https://doi.org/10.11649/ch.2019.005
Sarsembayev, A. 1999. Imagined communities: Kazak nationalism and Kazakification in the 1990s. Central Asian Survey 18. (3): 319-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634939995605
Sebentsov, A.B. 2018. Institucional'noe izmerenie prigranichnogo sotrudnichestva v Rossijskom prigranich'e (Institutional dimension of cross-border cooperation in Russia borderlands). Regionalnye Issledovania / Regional Studies 61. (3): 66-75.
Smith, J. 2017. The transformation of Soviet Republic borders to international borders: Competing concepts of the Kazakhstan-Russia border. Journal of Borderlands Studies 32. (1): 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1211958
Svanberg, I. 1994. In search of a Kazakhstani identity. Journal of Area Studies 2. (4): 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/02613539408455710
Vaishar, A. and Št'astná, M. 2019. Sustainable development of a peripheral mountain region on the state border: case study of Moravské Kopanice Microregion (Moravia). Sustainability 11. 5540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195540
Van Nijnatten, D.L. and Boychuk, G.W. 2004. Economic integration and cross‐border policy convergence: Social and environmental policy in Canadian provinces and American states. Journal of Borderlands Studies 19. (1): 37-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2004.9695616
Vardomsky, L.B. et al. 2019. Evrazijskaya Integraciya v Turbulentnom Mire (Eurasian integration in a turbulent world). Saint Petersburg, Aletheia Publishing House.
Vieira, A. 2017. A tale of two unions: Russia-Belarus integration experience and its lessons for the Eurasian Economic Union. Journal of Borderlands Studies 32. (1): 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1211959
Vinokurov, E.Yu. et al. 2015. Ocenka Vliyaniya Netarifnyh Bar'erov v EAES: Rezul'taty Oprosov Predpriyatij (Assessment of the impact of non-tarif barriers in the EAEU: Results of surveys of enterprises). Saint Petersburg, EАBR.
Wojcik, M., Dmochowska-Dudek, K., Jeziorska-Biel, P. and Tobiasz-Lis, P. 2018. Understanding strategies for overcoming peripherality: A Polish experience of transition. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 40. (40): 173-192. https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2018-0022
Zemlyak, S.V., Katrovsky, A.P., Kovalev, Ju.P. et al. 2018. Modernizatsiya i Strukturnyye Transformatsii Rossiysko-Belorusskogo Pogranich'ya (Modernization and structural transformations of the Russian Belarusian borderland). Smolensk, Universum.
Zotova, M., Gritsenko, A. and Sebentsov, A. 2018. Everyday life in the Russian borderlands: motives and factors of cross-border practices. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya 27. (4): 56-77. (in Russian)
Copyright (c) 2022 Kira Morachevskaya, Mikhail Karpenko, Alexander Sebentsov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
