Returning home: An evaluation of Hungarian return migration
Abstract
This paper deals with the Hungarian return migration process and the importance of identity changes for migration decisions. Outmigration of labour force from Hungary and other East Central European countries has intensified after the EU accession in 2004 and 2007. The possibility of free movement encouraged many Eastern and Central European citizens to leave their country; however, this is not a one-way process. A significant number of migrants returned to the home country with newly acquired skills and other assets. The majority of migration theories evaluate return migration by the role of family, motivations or different kinds of acquired capital, but the importance of identity change is less considered. Our primary aim is to investigate the future migration strategy of Hungarian returnees. The paper is based on national policy analysis and indepth interviews. According to our results, interviewees highlighted the role of work experience and family status. In general, highly skilled returnees met fewer obstacles during their return due to higher flexibility and former employer contracts, but family issues might represent more obstacles during the return. Lower skilled returnees were more dissatisfied with their return, especially those who migrated together with their family members. Hence, the chance for another emigration was higher than in the highly skilled group.
References
Berry, J.W. 1997. Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology 46. (1): 5–34. Crossref
Boros, L. and Pál, V. 2016. A magyarországi orvosmigráció néhány jellemzője (Some aspects of emigration of Hungarian doctors). Észak-Magyarországi Stratégiai Füzetek 13. (1): 64–72.
Cassarino, J-P. 2004. Theorising Return Migration: The Conceptual Approach to Return Migrants Revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies 6. (2): 253–279.
Conway, D. and Potter, R.B. 2009. Return Migration of the Next Generations: 21st Century Transnational Mobility. Ashgate, Farnham.
De Haas, H. 2010. Migration and development: A theoretical perspective. International Migration Review 44. (1): 227–264. Crossref
Egedy, T. and Kovács, Z. 2011. Budapest as a destination of migration: the view of transnational creative workers. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 60. (2): 161–188.
ESPON 2010. The ESPON 2013 Programme DEMIFER – Demographic and migratory flows affecting European regions and cities. Atlas of maps for Draft Final Report. Luxembourg, 37–74.
Glaser, W.A. and Habers, C.G. 1974. The migration and return of professionals. International Migration Review 8. (2): 227–244. Crossref
Gmelch, G. 1980. Return migration. American Review of Anthropology 9. 135–159. Crossref
Gödri, I. 2015. Nemzetközi vándorlás (International migration). In Demográfiai portré 2015. Eds.: Monostori, J., Őri, P. and Spéder, Zs., Budapest, KSH Népességtudományi Kutatóintézet, 187–211.
Gödri, I., Soltész, B. and Bodacz-Nagy, B. 2014. Immigration or emigration country? Migration trends and their socio-economic background in Hungary: A longer-term historical perspective. Working Papers on Population, Family and Welfare 19. Budapest, Hungarian Demographic Research Institute.
Hárs, Á., Simonovits, B. and Sík, E. 2004. The labour market and migration: Threat or opportunity? In Social report 2004. Eds.: Kolosi, T., Tóth, I. Gy. and Vukovich, Gy., Budapest, TÁRKI, 261–278.
Hegedűs, G. and Lados, G. 2015. A remigrációval kapcsolatos európai és magyarországi nemzeti politikák elemzése (Analysis of national remigration policies in European and Hungarian context). Észak- Magyarországi Stratégiai Füzetek 12. (1): 38–49.
Illés, S. and Kincses, Á. 2012. Hungary as receiving country for circulars. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 61. (3): 197–218.
Kapitány, B. and Rohr, A. 2013. A Magyarországon állandó lakcímmel rendelkező 18–49 éves magyar állampolgárok mintegy 7,4 százaléka tartózkodik jelenleg tartósan külföldön (7.4 percent of Hungarian citizens between 18–49 years and owning a permanent address in Hungary is permanently residing abroad). Korfa 13. (3): 1–3.
Kincses, Á. 2014. Nemzetközi migrációs körkép Magyarországról a 2011-es népszámlálási adatok alapján (Review of international migration concerning Hungary according to population census 2011). Területi Statisztika 54. (6): 590–605.
Kovács, Z., Boros, L., Hegedűs, G. and Lados, G. 2012. Returning people to the homeland: Tools and methods supporting remigrants in a European context (Baseline Report). Leipzig, Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde.
Lados, G., Hegedűs, G., Kovács, Z. and Boros, L. 2015. Oda és vissza – Az elvándorlás hatásainak és a visszavonzás lehetőségeinek értékelése hazánkban (Back and forth – Evaluating effects of emigration and possibilities of return migration in Hungary). In Otthon a Kárpátmedencében. Eds.: Fábián, A. and Bertalan, L., Sopron, Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetemi Kiadó, 115–136.
Langer-Rédei, M. 2007. Mozgásban a világ. A nemzetközi migráció földrajza (The World in motion. Geography of international migration). Budapest, ELTE Eötvös Kiadó.
Lowell, L.B. 2001. Policy Responses to the International Mobility of Skilled Labour. International Migration Papers 45. Geneva, International Labour Office.
Martin, R. and Radu, D. 2012. Return migration: The experience of Eastern Europe. International Migration 50. (6): 109–128. Crossref
Nagy, G. 2010. A világgazdaság és a globális munkaerőpiac (The world economy and global labour market). In A globális gazdaság földrajzi dimenziói. Eds.: Mészáros, R. et al., Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó, 229–248.
Pál, V. and Boros, L. 2010. A globális gazdaság ágazati és területi jellemzői (The sectorial and spatial features of global economy). In A globális gazdaság földrajzi dimenziói. Eds.: Mészáros, R. et al., Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó, 123–198.
Sinatti, G. and Horst, C. 2015. Migrants as agents of development: Diaspora engagement discourse and practice in Europe. Ethnicities 15. (1): 134–152. Sussman, N.M. 2011. Return migration and identity. A
global phenomenon, a Hong Kong case. Hong Kong, Hong Kong University Press.
Van Houte, M. and Davids, T. 2008. Development and Return Migration: from policy panacea to migrant perspective sustainability. Third World Quarterly 29. (7): 1411–1429. Crossref
Wickramasekara, P. 2011. Circular migration: a triple win or a dead end? Global Union Research Network. Discussion Paper 15. Geneva, International Labour Office.
“Come Home, Youth” Programme. Accessed 13.06.2016
Hungary scraps “Come Home, Youth” programme, 13.06.2016
The continuation of “Come Home, Youth” Programme, 10.06.2016
Copyright (c) 2017 Gábor Lados, Gábor Hegedűs
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
