Subcultural space through the adaptive cycle – Resistance and commodification in Berlin Kreuzberg SO36

Keywords: subculture, gentrification, production of space, adaptive cycle, Berlin

Abstract

Urban transformation is commonly interpreted through processes of capital accumulation, gentrification, and displacement, while less attention has been paid to the temporal trajectories of subcultural spaces and their changing relationship with commodification. This study examines whether Holling’s adaptive cycle provides a useful analytical framework for interpreting these transformations in Berlin’s Kreuzberg SO36. The research combines literature and document analysis with fieldwork conducted during four visits between 2023 and 2025, including systematic site observation and photographic documentation, supplemented by focused microinterviews. Three symbolically significant sites – the Georg von Rauch Haus, M99, and Cuvrybrache – are examined as contrasting trajectories of subcultural spatial production. The findings show that these spaces can be interpreted through different phases of the adaptive cycle, characterized by changing configurations of potential, connectedness, and resilience. The cases further demonstrate that the accumulation of cultural and symbolic value can simultaneously strengthen subcultural spaces and increase their susceptibility to institutionalization and economic appropriation. However, these trajectories are not deterministic: legalization may constrain autonomy while supporting persistence, whereas displacement and redevelopment produce different outcomes. The study demonstrates the value of the adaptive cycle as a qualitative heuristic for interpreting the non-linear transformation of contested urban spaces.

References

BERKES, F. and ROSS, H. 2016. Panarchy and community resilience: Sustainability science and policy implications. Environmental Science & Policy 61. 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.004

Berlin Besetzt 2012. Illustrierte Karte zu Hausbesetzungen in Berlin. Pappsatt Medienkollektiv. Berlin Kreuzberg, Papiertiger-Archiv, Umbruch-Foto-Archiv & Azozomox. Available at https://berlin-besetzt.de/

BERNT, M. and HOLM, A. 2013. Exploring the substance and style of gentrification: Berlin’s “Prenzlberg.” In The Berlin Reader. Eds.: BERNT, M. GRELL, B. and HOLM, A., Berlin, Transcript Verlag, 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/transcript.9783839424780.107

BERNT, M. 2022. The Commodification Gap. Gentrification and Public Policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119603061

BLACKMAN, S. 2005. Youth subcultural theory: A critical engagement with the concept, its origins and politics, from the Chicago school to postmodernism. Journal of Youth Studies 8. (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260500063629

BOURDIEU, P. 2008. A szimbolikus tőke (The symbolic capital). In A társadalmi egyenlőtlenségek újratermelődése. Translated by FERGE, ZS. and LÉDERER, P., Budapest, General Press Kiadó, 272–287.

COHEN, P. 1972. Subcultural conflict and working class community. In Working Papers in Cultural Studies, CCCS. Birmingham, University of Birmingham, 5–51.

CONNELL, K. and HILTON, M. 2015. The working practices of Birmingham’s Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies. Social History 40. (3): 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071022.2015.1043191

CZARNIAWSKA, B. and MAZZA, C. 2003. Consulting as a liminal space. Human Relations 56. (3): 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056003612

DRISSEL, D. 2011. Anarchist punks resisting gentrification. Countercultural contestations of space in the new Berlin. The International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review 10. (8): 19–44. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9508/CGP/v08i10/42992

ERŐSS, Á. and TÁTRAI, P. 2010. Ethnic features of symbolic appropriation of public space in changing geopolitical frames – The case of Oradea/Nagyvárad. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 59. (1): 51–68.

FRASER, N. 2022. Cannibal Capitalism: How our System is Devouring Democracy, Care, and the Planet – and What We can Do about it. London, Verso.

GUNDERSON, L.H. and HOLLING, C.S. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Biological Conservation 114. (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00041-7

HALL, S. and JEFFERSON, T. (eds.) 1976. Resistance Through Rituals. Youth Subcultures in Post-War Britain. London, Hutchinson.

HARVEY, D. 2006. Spaces of Global Capitalism. London, Verso.

HELBRECHT, I. 2018. Gentrification and displacement. In Gentrification and Resistance. Ed.: HELBRECHT, I., Wiesbaden, Springer VS, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20388-7_1

HERRMANN, D., SHUSTER, W., MAYER, A. and GARMESTANI, A. 2016. Sustainability for shrinking cities. Sustainability 8. (9): 911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090911

HOCHMUTH, H. 2017. The return of Berlin-Kreuzberg. Brought back from the margins by memory. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 25. (4): 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2017.1361817

HOLLING, C.S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics (4). 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245

HOLLING, C.S. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4. (5): 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5

HUANG, X. 2019. Understanding Bourdieu – Cultural capital and habitus. Review of European Studies 11. (3): 45. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v11n3p45

HÜBSCHER, M. and KALLERT, T. 2023. Taming airbnb locally: Analysing regulations in Amsterdam, Berlin and London. Journal of Economic and Human Geography 114. (1): 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12537

JEFFERSON, T. (ed.). 2002. Resistance through Rituals. London, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224946

KAPPELER, M. and LIEBEL, M. 2022. Das Georg-v.-Rauch-Haus in Berlin-Kreuzberg. Sozial Extra 46. (2): 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12054-022-00474-3

KING, L. 2019. Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of the City. Eds.: MEAGHER, S.M., NOLL, S. and BIEHL, J.S., London, Routledge, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315681597-7

KOHN, M. 2003. Radical Space. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501731747

LEFEBVRE, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Vol. 1. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

LENNERT, L. 2014. Anti-capitalist communes remaining despite legalisation: The case of house projects in Berlin. In The Squatters’ Movement in Europe: Commons and Autonomy as Alternatives to Capitalism. Eds.: ANGEL, M., CATTANEO, C. and LOPEZ, M., London, Pluto Press, 60–61.

Luisenstadt eG. 2026. Luisenstadt eG. Retrieved 27 January, 2025 from https://luisenstadteg.de/en/

LYDSSAN, Y. 2020. Two decades of activism on the Cuvrybrache, Part I–II. City Tool Box. Available at https://www.citytoolbox.net/journal/two-decades-of-activism-on-the-cuvrybrache-part-i/

MERRILL, S. 2021. Buffing and buffering Blu: The societal performance of street art, heritage erasure and digital preservation in Berlin. International Journal of Heritage Studies 27. (6): 601–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1843522

NOVY, J. and COLOMB, C. 2013. Struggling for the right to the (creative) city in Berlin and Hamburg: New urban social movements, new ‘spaces of hope’? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37. (5): 1816–1838. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01115.x

PETTAS, D. and SUWALA, L. 2023. The spatio-temporal dynamics of the short-term rental market in Berlin (2008–2020) – The case of airbnb. Die Erde 154. (1–2): 54–61. https://doi.org/10.12854/erde-2023-650

ROGERS, J.D. 2017. Dynamic trajectories, adaptive cycles, and complexity in culture change. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 24. (4): 1326–1355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-017-9314-6

ROGOV, M. and ROZENBLAT, C. 2018. Urban resilience discourse analysis: Towards a multi-level approach to cities. Sustainability 10. (12): 4431. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124431

SAEZ UJAQUE, D., ROCA, E., DE BALANZÓ JOUE, R., FUERTES, P. and GARCIA-ALMIRALL, P. 2021. Resilience and urban regeneration policies. Lessons from community-led initiatives. The case study of Can Fugarolas in Mataro (Barcelona). Sustainability 13. (22): 12855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212855

SCHARENBERG, A. and BADER, I. 2009. Berlin’s waterfront site struggle. City 13. (2–3): 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982938

SIEMER, J. and MATTHEWS-HUNTER, K. 2017. The spatial pattern of gentrification in Berlin. Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays 19. 49–57.

SMITH, N. 2002. New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode 34. 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00249

SOJA, E. 1980. The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70. (2): 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x

SOJA, E.W. 1996. Thirdspace. Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Oxford, Blackwell.

STORS, N. 2022. Constructing new urban tourism space through Airbnb. Tourism Geographies 24. (4–5): 692–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1750683

THORNTON, S. 1995. Club Cultures: Music, Media and Subcultural Capital. Cambridge, Polity Press.

TILL, D. (in press). Adaptive cycles of resistance: Counterculture and gentrification in Berlin SO36. Critical Housing Analysis.

VOLLMER, L. 2018. Mieter innenproteste von den 1960er bis in die 1980er Jahre in der BRD. Suburban. Zeitschrift Für Kritische Stadtforschung 6. (2–3): 137–148. https://doi.org/10.36900/suburban.v6i2/3.434

WALKER, B., HOLLING, C.S., CARPENTER, S.R. and KINZIG, A. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9. (2): 5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/

WOLFGANG, A.C. 2016. Replay Value Toward an Architecture of Future Narratives. Seattle, University of Washington.

Published
2026-09-30
How to Cite
TillD., & SümeghyD. (2026). Subcultural space through the adaptive cycle – Resistance and commodification in Berlin Kreuzberg SO36. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 75(3), 357-372. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.75.3.5
Section
Articles