Political economy and everyday practices behind gentrification in working-class urban neighbourhoods
Abstract
This paper explores the synthesis of political-economy perspectives on uneven development with everyday-focused social-theoretical approaches, specifically examining gentrification through the lens of working-class residents’ experiences. The study argues that while uneven development imposes rigid structural constraints, it also serves to differentiate the working class and its internal constituents. The research is situated within the Central and Eastern European context, focusing on two Hungarian case study locations: Nagysándortelep in Debrecen and the Zsolnay district in Pécs. The methodology employs a multi-scalar approach, combining historical analysis with qualitative insights from narrative, semi-structured and focus group interviews. The analysis traces the evolution of both districts from their origins as industrial working-class colonies consolidated during the capitalist processes of the late 19th century through subsequent periods of socialiststate-led disinvestment and neoliberal urban strategies of capital reinvestment. By studying the current relationship of workers to slow, sporadic, and spontaneous gentrification within this urban-historical context, mutually reinforcing and undermining moments of structure and everyday practices emerge, exposing the dialectical relationship between the causes and consequences of gentrification. By bridging the gap between structural theories and micro-level agency, the paper contributes to a more nuanced understanding of how the production of space is negotiated and contested within the specific urban trajectories of the CEE region.
References
ALEXANDRI, G. 2015. Unravelling the yarn of gentrification trends in the contested inner city of Athens. In Global Gentrifications: Uneven Development and Displacement. Eds.: LEES, L., SHIN, H.B. and LÓPEZ-MORALES, E., Bristol, University Press – Policy Press, 19−35. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t894bt
ATKINSON, R. 2004. The evidence on the impact of gentrification: new lessons for the urban renaissance? International Journal of Housing Policy 4. (1): 107−131. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461671042000215479
BALOGH, L. 2020. Adalékok a debreceni ipari téglagyártás történetéhez (Notes on the history of industrial brick manufacturing in Debrecen). Cívisporta 2. 109−244. (online publication). civisporta.hu/CP/civisporta_2020_2.pdf
BERÉNYI, B.E. 2016. Dzsentrifikációkutatás a poszt-szocialista városokban – Merre tovább? (Research on gentrification in post-socialist cities – Which way to go?). Földrajzi Közlemények 140. (3): 204−215.
BÉRES, A. 2025. Shrinking, growing or overburdened? − Territorial patterns in child demographics and institutional burden in Hungary’s public education system after 2021. In Interdisciplinary Dialogues for the Twentieth Anniversary of the SZJSZK. Eds.: BÉRES, A. and KOVÁCS, T., Pécs, PTE TTK János Szentágothai College of Advanced Studies, 48–76. https://doi.org/10.15170/TTK-SZJSZK-2025b-4
BÉRES, A., MÁTÉ, É. and ANDL, H. 2025. At the bottom and top of the educational system: Spatial patterns of highest educational attainment based on the Hungarian census of 2022. European Spatial Research and Policy 32. (2): 45–74. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.32.2.10
BERKI, M. and SÁGI, M. 2026. Sometimes up, sometimes down on the seesaw: Experiencing industrial investment and disinvestment in Budapest’s Ganz-MÁVAG manufacturing site and Kazincbarcika’s chemical plant. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 75. (2): 165-179. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.75.2.2
BERNT, M. 2016. How post-socialist is gentrification? Observations in East Berlin and Saint Petersburg. Eurasian Geography and Economics 57. (4–5): 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2016.1259079
CAULFIELD, J. 1994. City Form and Everyday Life: Toronto’s Gentrification and Critical Social Practic. Toronto, University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442672970
CHELCEA, L. 2006. Marginal groups in central places: Gentrification, property rights and post-socialist primitive accumulation. In Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres: The Case of Central Europe. Eds.: ENYEDI, GY. and KOVÁCS, Z., Pécs, Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 127–146.
CLARK, E. 1991. Rent gaps and value gaps: complementary or contradictory. In Urban Housing for the Better-off: Gentrification in Europe. Eds.: VAN WEESEP, J. and MUSTERD, S., Utrecht, Stedelijke Netwerken, 17–30.
CREED, G. 1998. Domesticating Revolution: From Socialist Reform to Ambivalent Transition in a Bulgarian Village. University Press, PennState.
CSANÁDI, G., CSIZMADY, A., KŐSZEGHY, L. and TOMAY, K. 2007. A városrehabilitáció társadalmi hatásai Budapesten (Social impacts of city rehabilitation in Budapest). In A történelmi városközpontok átalakulásának társadalmi hatásai. Ed.: ENYEDI, GY., Budapest, MTA Társadalomkutató Központ, 93–118.
CSOBA, J. 2020. Nagysándor (Alexander the Great)-colony (Debrecen, Hungary). In Social Work and Challenges of Urban Diversity. Eds.: HENDRIKS, P. and KLOPPENBURG, R., Maastricht, EASSW, 52−58. https://www.eassw.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/05/Urban-diversities-booklet-final-version-january-23-2020.pdf
CZIRFUSZ, M., HORVÁTH, V., JELINEK, CS., PÓSFAI, ZS. and SZABÓ, L. 2015. Gentrification and rescaling urban governance in Budapest-Józsefváros. Intersections 1. (4): 55–77. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v1i4.104
DAVIDSON, M. and LEES, L. 2005. New build gentrification and London’s riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37. 1165–90. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3739
Debrecen MJV 2008. Debrecen Integrált Városfejlesztési Stratégiájának elfogadásáról (About the acceptance of integrated urban development strategy of Debrecen). Debrecen, Euro-Régió Ház Kht. Debrecen MJV Önkormányzatának Közlönye 2008. (10).
Debrecen MJV 2014. Debrecen Integrált Településfejlesztési Stratégiája, 2014–2020 (Integrated urban development strategy of Debrecen, 2014–2020). Debrecen, Euro-Régió Ház Kht. – INNOVA Észak-alföld Regionális Fejlesztési és Innovációs Ügynökség Nonprofit Kft.
Debrecen MJV 2022. Debrecen Fenntartható Városfejlesztési Stratégiája, 2021–2027 (Sustainable urban development strategy of Debrecen, 2021–2027). Debrecen, EDC Debrecen Nonprofit Kft.
DOUCET, B. and KOENDERS, D. 2018. “At least it’s not a ghetto anymore”: Experiencing gentrification and ‘false choice urbanism’ in Rotterdam’s Afrikaanderwijk. Urban Studies 55. (16): 3631–3649. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018761853
EGEDY, T. 2009. Városrehabilitáció és életminőség (City rehabilitation and quality of life). Budapest, MTA Földrajztudományi Kutató Intézet. Available at https://real-eod.mtak.hu/id/eprint/4507
ELLIOTT-COOPER, A., HUBBARD, P. and LEES, L. 2019. Moving beyond Marcuse: Gentrification, displacement and the violence of unhoming. Progress in Human Geography 44. (3): 492–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519830511
FABULA, SZ., KRONSTEIN, B., BERKI, M. and TIMÁR, J. 2025. Uneven development and everyday life – a literature review. Unpublished manuscript available from the authors.
FARAGÓ, L. 2010. Pécs fejlődési pályája – Egy pécsi polgár szemével (The development of Pécs – Through the eyes of a Pécs resident). Területfejlesztés és Innováció. 4. (1): 1–14. https://www.terinno.hu/szamok/teruletfejlesztes_es_innovacio_2010_1.pdf
GENTILE, M., SALUKVADZE, J. and GOGISHVILI, D. 2015. Newbuild gentrification, tele-urbanization and urban growth: Placing the cities of the post-communist South in the gentrification debate. Geografie 120. (2): 134–163. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2015120020134
HAMNETT, C. and RANDOLPH, W. 1984. The role of landlord disinvestment in housing market transformation: An analysis of the flat break-up market in central London. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 9. 259−279. https://doi.org/10.2307/622233
HARVEY, D. 1982. The Limits to Capital. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
HOLM, A., MARCIŃCZAK, S. and OGRODOWCZYK, A. 2015. New-build gentrification in the post-socialist city: Łodź and Leipzig two decades after socialism. Geografie 120. (2): 164–187. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2015120020164
HOROG, M. 2022. „A citromszigettől az új magyar szilikonvölgyig”: Dzsentrifikáció és természetes támogatórendszerek a Nagysándortelepen (“From the lime island to the new Hungarian silicon valley”: Gentrification and natural support systems on the Nagysándortelep). Cívisporta 1. 7−68. (online publication). https://civisporta.hu/CP/civisporta_2022_1.pdf
JÁMBOR, V.E. and VEDRÉDI, K. 2016. On the edge of new public spaces – City-centre renewal and exclusion in Kaposvár, Hungary. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 65. (3): 225−235. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.65.3.2
JELINEK, CS. 2011. State-Led Gentrification and Relocation in Budapest: Vacating a House in Ferencváros. Budapest, Central European University. Available at http://www.etd.ceu.hu/2011/jelinek_csaba.pdf MA
KATZ, C. and KIRBY, A. 1991. In the nature of things: The environment and everyday life. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 16. (3): 259−271. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/622947
KONRÁD, GY. and SZELÉNYI, I. 1971. A késleltetett városfejlődés társadalmi konfliktusai (Social conflicts of underurbanisation). Valóság 12. 19–35.
KOVÁCS, Z., WIESSNER, R. and ZISCHNER, R. 2013. Urban renewal in the inner city of Budapest: Gentrification from a post-socialist perspective. Urban Studies 50. (1): 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012453856
KOVÁCS, Z., WIESSNER, R. and ZISCHNER, R. 2015. Beyond gentrification: Diversified neighbourhood upgrading in the inner city of Budapest. Geografie 120. (2): 251–274. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2015120020251
KOZMA, G. 1994. Lakóterület- és népességszámváltozások Debrecenben az 1930-as évek vége és 1990 között (Changes in residential areas and population figures in Debrecen between the late 1930s and 1990). In Tanulmányok Debrecen városföldrajzából I. Ed.: SÜLI-ZAKAR, I., Debrecen, Kossuth Lajos Tudományegyetem Társadalomföldrajzi Tanszék, 83−102.
KUBEŠ, J. and KOVÁCS, Z. 2020. The kaleidoscope of gentrification in post-socialist cities. Urban Studies 57. (13): 2591−2611. https://doi.org/10.1177/004209801988925
KUBEŠ, J. and KOVÁCS, Z. 2025. Provincial gentrification in the Global North – A literature review. Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning 157. 105586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105586
LEFEBVRE, H. 1971 [1968]. Everyday Life in the Modern World. Translated by Rabinovitch, S. Allen Lane, Harmondsworth.
LEFEBVRE, H. 1991 [1974]. The Production of Space. Translated by Nicholson-Smith, D., Oxford, Blackwell.
LICHTENBERGER, E., CSÉFALVAY, Z. and PAAL, M. 1995. Várospusztulás és felújítás Budapesten (Urban decay and renewal in Budapest). Budapest, Magyar Trendkutató Központ.
MARCUSE, P. 1986. Abandonment, gentrification, and displacement: The linkages in New York City. In Gentrification of the City. Eds.: SMITH, N. and WILLIAMS, P., Boston, Allen and Unwin, 121–152.
MARSTON, S. and SMITH, N. 2001. States, scales and households: Limits to scale thinking? A response to Brenner. Progress in Human Geography 25. 615–619. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201682688968
MASSEY, D. 1994. Space, Place and Gender. Cambridge, Polity Press.
MIHÁLY, M. and FABULA, Sz. 2026. Producing food in intensively transforming landscapes – The case of the Sand Ridge, Hungary. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 75. (2): 181-209. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.75.2.3
MOLNÁR, E., DÉZSI, GY., LENGYEL, I. and KOZMA, G. 2018. Vidéki nagyvárosaink gazdaságának összehasonlító elemzése (A comparative economic analysis of major Hungarian regional centres). Területi Statisztika 58. (6): 610–637. https://doi.org/10.15196/TS580604
NAGY, E., KOZMA, G. and MOLNÁR, E. 2026. Strategic coupling in the European (global?) periphery: Debrecen as an emerging location of the automotive industry. Progress in Economic Geography 4. (1): 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peg.2026.100070
NAGY, E. and TIMÁR, J. 2012. Urban restructuring in the grip of capital and politics: Gentrification in East Central Europe. In Development of the Settlement Network in the Central European Countries: Past, Present and Future. Eds.: CSAPÓ, T. and BALOGH, A., Heidelberg, Springer, 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20314-5_9
PAPP, J. 2017. Debrecen bemutatása: Általános településkép, települési karakter (An introduction to Debrecen: General townscape, settlement character). In Debrecen Településképi Arculati Kézikönyv. Edited by the General Architect of Debrecen. Debrecen, Debrecen MJV Önkormányzata, 7–17.
PATON, K. 2014. Gentrification: A Working-Class Perspective. Farnham, Ashgate.
Pécs MJV 2022. Fenntartható Városfejlesztési Stratégia 2021–2027 (Sustainable urban development strategy 2021–2027). Pécs, EX ANTE Tanácsadó Iroda Kft. Available at http://www.baranya.hu/dokumentum/1754
PILKHOFFER, M. 2021. Expansion between the middle of the nineteenth century up to the First World War. In Hungarian Atlas of Historic Towns, No. 8. Ed.: FEDELES, T., Pécs–Budapest, University of Pécs – Institute of History, ELRN Research Centre for Humanities, 47–52.
PIRISI, G., STEFÁN, K. and TRÓCSÁNYI, A. 2008. The role of cultural economy in the revival of cities – endowments and chances of the city of Pécs. In Progress in Geography in the European Capital of Culture 2010. Eds.: LÓCZY, D., TÓTH, J. and TRÓCSÁNYI, A., Pécs, Imedias Kiadó, 11–23.
PÓLA, P., PÁLNÉ, K.I. and GIBÁRTI, S. 2023. Pécs, egy periféria fővárosa (Pécs, the capital of a periphery). Tér és Társadalom 37. (3): 148–175. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.37.3.3493
RECHNITZER, J., CSIZMADIA, Z. and GROSZ, A. 2004. A magyar városhálózat tudásalapú megújító képessége az ezredfordulón (The knowledge-based renewal capacity of the Hungarian urban network at the turn of the millennium). Tér és Társadalom 18. (2): 117–156. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.18.2.949
ROSE, D. 1984. Rethinking gentrification: Beyond the uneven development of Marxist urban theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2. (1): 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1068/d020047
RUOPPILA, S. and KÄHRIK, A. 2003. Socio-economic residential differentiation in postsocialist Tallinn. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 18. (1): 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022435000258
SÁGI, M. 2022. The geographical scales of fear: Spatiality of emotions, emotional spatialities. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 71. (1): 55–65. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.71.1.4
SÁPI, L. 1972. Debrecen település- és építéstörténete (Settlement and architectural history of Debrecen). Debrecen, Déri Múzeum Baráti Köre.
SIPOS, B. 2024. A második 15 éves lakásépítési program célja és megvalósítása Pécsett 1975–1990 között (Objectives and implementation of the second 15-year national housing programme in Pécs, 1975–1990). In Fejezetek a pécsi-baranyai gazdaság történetéből: Gazdaságtörténeti tanulmányok. Eds.: SZIRTES, G. and VARGHA, D., Pécs, Pécs-Baranyai Kereskedelmi és Iparkamara – Pro Pannonia Kiadó, 216–236.
SLATER, T. 2009. Missing Marcuse: On gentrification and displacement. City 13. (2): 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982250
SMITH, A. and ROCHOVSKÁ, A. 2007. Domesticating neo-liberalism: Everyday lives and the geographies of post-socialist transformations. Geoforum 38. (6): 1163–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.03.003
SMITH, J.L. 2022. Continuing processes of uneven development in post-apartheid South Africa. African Geographical Review 41. (2): 168–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2020.1860098
SMITH, N. 1982. Gentrification and uneven development. Economic Geography 58. (2): 139–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/143793
SMITH, N. 1990 [1984]. Uneven Development. Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. Cambridge, Basil Blackwell.
SMITH, N. 1992a. Geography, difference and the politics of scale. In Postmodernism and the Social Sciences. Eds.: DOHERTY, J., GRAHAM, E. and MALEK, M., London, Palgrave Macmillan, 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22183-7_4
SMITH, N. 1992b. Contours of a spatialized politics: Homeless vehicles and the production of geographical scale. Social Text 33. 54–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/466434
SMITH, N. 1996. The New Urban Frontier. Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London and New York, Routledge.
SMITH, N. 2000. Gentrification. In The Dictionary of Human Geography. Eds.: JOHNSTON, R.J., GREGORY, D., PRATT, G. and WATTS, M., Oxford, Blackwell, 294–296.
SMITH, N. 2002. New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode 34. 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00249
SUDERMANN, Y. 2015. When authoritarianism embraces gentrification – the case of Old Damascus, Syria. In Global Gentrifications: Uneven Development and Displacement. Eds.: LEES, L., SHIN, H.B. and LÓPEZ-MORALES, E., Bristol, University Press – Policy Press, 395−417. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447313472.003.0020
SÝKORA, L. 1993. City in transition: The role of rent gaps in Prague's revitalization, Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie / Journal of Economic and Human Ggeography 84. (4): 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1993.tb01770.x
SÝKORA, L. 2005. Gentrification in post-communist cities. In Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism. Eds.: ATKINSON, R. and BRIDGE, G., London, Routledge, 90–105. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392089_chapter_6
SZELÉNYI, I. 1983. Urban Inequalities Under State Socialism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
SZIRMAI, V. 2019. Városok és városlakók (Cities and city dwellers). Budapest, Corvina Kiadó.
TAGAI, G. and KRONSTEIN, B. 2026. Characteristics and courses of uneven development in Central and Eastern Europe – the evolution of places of underdevelopment. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 75. (2): 211-230. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.75.2.4
THREADGOLD, S., MOLNAR, L., SHARP, M., COFFEY, J. and FARRUGIA, D. 2024. Hospitality workers and gentrification processes: Elective belonging and reflexive complicity. The British Journal of Sociology 75. (5): 892–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13138
TIMÁR, J. 2019. “Államosított tértermelés” a kiszorítottak perspektívájából egy dzsentrifikálódó városrészben (The “nationalised production of space” from the perspective of displaced people in an urban district undergoing gentrification). Tér és Társadalom 33. (4): 38−60. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.33.4.3204
TOMAY, K. and BERGER, V. 2024. Inclusion oreExclusion? The spatial habitus of rural gentrifiers. Social Inclusion 12. 7787. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.7787
TRÓCSÁNYI, A. 2011. The spatial implications of urban renewal carried out by the ECC programs in Pécs. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 60. (3): 261–284. Available at https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/hungeobull/article/view/3058
VELKEY, G. 2022. The increasing replication of territorial and social inequalities in public education in Hungary – Causes, components, practices and mechanisms. Social Sciences 11. (3): 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11030095
YEUNG, H.W., PUENTE LOZANO, P., BENEDEK, J., ŢOIU, A. and GYURIS, F. 2025. Panel discussion of Henry Yeung’s Theory and Explanation in Geography. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 74. (3): 233–252. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.74.3.1
Other source:
Copyright (c) 2026 Judit Timár, András Trócsányi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
