From community space to no man‘s land? – The use of public space by vulnerable social groups in post-socialist housing estates. A case from Budapest, Hungary
Abstract
Under state socialist planning, large housing estates were built as inclusive, community-centred environments. These spaces were particularly safe for women and children, reinforced by intense social control and close neighbourhood ties. Our study examines the transformation and use of public spaces in post-socialist housing estates, with a particular focus on vulnerable social groups. The research sample area was the Central Housing Estate of Budapest-Pesterzsébet (20th district). The research is based on a complex methodology; in addition to secondary methods, we conducted quantitative and qualitative primary research (resident questionnaire survey, walking interviews/in-depth field interviews, mental map studies, and mapping of pedestrian movement patterns). According to our findings, community areas that were previously actively used have now mostly become underused, neglected spaces that pose a risk to safety. These changes particularly affect young and middle-aged women and young people, limiting their movement and participation in urban life. Research on pedestrian space utilisation has shown that residents‘ spatial movement basically follows traditional routes, avoiding originally protected and traffic-free routes. This proves that socially oriented planning and the physical infrastructure created as a result do not, in themselves, guarantee the creation of inclusive, safe spaces that can be occupied by communities. A static public space that maintains its former characteristics can lose its social base. For the population to return to community areas, it is necessary to conduct a detailed assessment of the needs of different age groups and genders, and to take them into account in urban planning and development.
References
ANDERSON, J., RUGGERI, K. and STEEMERS, K. 2017. Lively social space, well-being activity, and urban design: Findings from a low-cost community-led public space intervention. Environment and Behavior 49. (6): 685–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516659108
AVAR, S. and KARIMI, M. 2025. Cultural contexts and urban design: Women’s experiences of safety in public spaces in Iran and the United States. Current Opinion 5. (1): 1096–1109.
BENKŐ, M., BALLA, R. and HORY, G. 2018. Participatory place making in the renewal of post-communist large prefabricated housing estates: Újpalota case study, Budapest. Journal of Place Management and Development 11. (2): 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-06-2017-0050
BIDDULPH, R. and SANDBERG, M. 2024. The outdoor area implications of mixed housing tenure initiatives – A Swedish case in Tynnered, Gothenburg. Land 13. 1942. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111942
BLÖBAUM, A. and HUNECKE, M. 2005. Perceived danger in urban public space. The impacts of physical features and personal factors. Environment and Behavior 37. (4): 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504269643
BOROS, L., FABULA, SZ., HORVÁTH, D. and KOVÁCS, Z. 2016. Urban diversity and the production of public space in Budapest. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 65. (3): 209–224. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.65.3.1
DEKKER, K., DE VOS, S., MUSTERD, S. and VAN KEMPEN, R. 2011. Residential satisfaction in housing estates in European cities: A multi-level research approach. Housing Studies 26. (4): 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2011.559751
ELSINGA, M. and WASSENBERG, F. 1991. Tackling crime and vandalism on post-war housing estates: The Dutch approach. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 6. 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496575
EVANS, J. and JONES, P. 2011. The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied Geography 31. (2): 849–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005
FERRARO, K.F. 1995. Fear of Crime: Interpreting Victimization Risk. New York, State University of New York Press.
FRIEDRICH, K. and RÖßLER, S. 2023. Built space hinders lived space: Social encounters and appropriation in large housing estates. Urban Planning 8. (4): 145–161. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i4.6448
GARCIA-RAMON, M.D., ORTIZ, A. and PRATS, M. 2004. Urban planning, gender and the use of public space in a peripheral neighbourhood of Barcelona. Cities 21. 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2004.03.006
GEHL, J. 2010. Cities for People. Washington–Covelo–London, Island Press.
GOGISHVILI, D., AGHASYAN, V., ASABASHVILI, L., BLAAUW, B., ERNSTEN, C., GARDNER, E., JANMAAT, J., JIN, S., KANDELAKI, N., KRYAZHEVA, Y., MAMRIKISHVILI, S., MIRZIKASHVILI, R., NADAREISHVILI, N., NEVSKAYA, I., SHONIA, L., XUNDADZE, L. and ZADORIN, D. 2017. Micro rayon living – everyday life strategies and DIY practices in the post-Soviet micro rayon. Partizan Publik Projekt. Researchgate.net publication. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12757.63203
GORCZYCA, K. 2016. The social transformation of large housing estates in Poland at the turn of the 21st century. Czech Sociological Review 52. (6): 861–892. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2016.52.6.289
GRUNDSTRÖM, K. and LELÉVRIER, C. 2023. Imposing ‘enclosed communities’? Urban gating of large housing estates in Sweden and France. Land 12. (8): 1535. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081535
GUTIÉRREZ-UJAQUE, D., DEGEN, M. and BONASTRA, Q. 2025. Using GIFscapes to examine young people’s affective experiences of urban spaces. Geoforum 160. 104231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104231
HAASE, A., GROSSMANN, K. and STEINFÜHRER, A. 2012. Transitory urbanites: New actors of residential change in Polish and Czech inner cities. Cities 29. (5): 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.006
HIRT, S.A. 2012. Iron Curtains: Gates, Suburbs and Privatization of Space in the Post-Socialist City. Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118295922
JACOBS, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York, Random House.
JÁMBOR, V.E. and VEDRÉDI, K. 2016. On the edge of new public spaces – City-centre renewal and exclusion in Kaposvár, Hungary. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 65. (3): 225–235. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.65.3.2
KALM, K., ŠPAČEKOVÁ, P. and SÝKORA, J. 2023. Housing estates’ trajectories in post-socialist countries: Similarities and differences of Estonian and Czech cities. Cities 135. 104209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104209
KISSFAZEKAS, K. 2022. Circle of paradigms? Or ’15 minute’ neighbourhoods from the 1950s. Cities 123. 10358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103587
KOVÁCS, Z., EGEDY, T. and SZABÓ, B. 2018. Persistence or change: Divergent trajectories of large housing estates in Budapest, Hungary. Housing estates of the 1970s. In Housing Estates in Europe: Perspectives on the Built Environment, Social Life and Policy. Eds.: HESS, D.B., TAMMARU, T. and VAN HAM, M., Cham, Springer, 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92813-5_9
KÖBER, G., OBERWITTLER, D. and WICKES, R. 2022. Old age and fear of crime: cross-national evidence for a decreased impact of neighbourhood disadvantage in older age. Ageing and Society 42. (7): 1629–1658. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20001683
LANG, R. and NOVY, A. 2014. Cooperative housing and social cohesion: The role of linking social capital. European Planning Studies 22. (8): 1744–1764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.800025
LEETMAA, K. and HESS, D.B. 2019. Incomplete service networks in enduring socialist housing estates: Retrospective evidence from local centres in Estonia. In Housing Estates in the Baltic Countries. Eds.: HESS, D.B. and TAMMARU, T., Cham, Springer, 273–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23392-1_13
LEFEBVRE, H. 1991. The Production of Space (Translated by Nicholson-Smith, D.), Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell. https://philarchive.org/rec/LEFTPO-4
LEVIN, I., ARTHURSON, K. and ZIERSCH, A. 2014. Social mix and the role of design: Competing interests in the Carlton Public Housing Estate Redevelopment, Melbourne. Cities 40. 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.04.002
LI, W. and KERVEN, C. 2024. Between commons and anti-commons: A nested common-private interface framework. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11. 509. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02992-9
MASSEY, D. 1994. Space, Place, and Gender. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
MEHTA, V. 2013. The Street: A Quintessential Social Public Space. London, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203067635
MONTGOMERY, J. 2007. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design 3. (1): 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418
MOORE, G., FARDGHASSEMI, S. and JOFFE, H. 2023. Wellbeing in the city: Young adults’ sense of loneliness and social connection in deprived urban neighbourhoods. Wellbeing, Space and Society 5. 100172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2023.100172
MORENO, C. 2024. The 15-minute City. A Solution to Saving Our Time and Our Planet. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394308774
NAVARRETE HERNANDEZ, P., VETRO, A. and CONCHA, P. 2021. Building safer public spaces: Exploring gender difference in the perception of safety in public space through urban design interventions. Landscape and Urban Planning 214. 104180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104180
NEWMAN, O. 1972. Defensible Space: Crime Prevention through Urban Design. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
O'SULLIVAN, S., O'CONNELL, C. and BYRNE, L. 2020. ”Listen to what we have to say”: Children and young people’s perspectives on urban regeneration. Social Inclusion 8. (3): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i3.2884
OUŘEDNÍČEK, M. and KOPECKÁ, Z. 2023. Towards ordinary quarters: The development of housing estates in Prague after transformation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 38. 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09891-4
PATRICK, M. and MCKINNON, I. 2022. Co-creating inclusive public spaces: Learnings from four global case studies on inclusive cities. The Journal of Public Space 7. (2): 93–116. https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v7i2.1500
PEREIRA, A. and REBELO, E.M. 2024. Women in public spaces: Perceptions and initiatives to promote gender equality. Cities 154. 105346 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105346
PERRIGO, J.L., GINTHER, A., SYEDA, H.S., SHIER, V. and DATAR, A. 2025. Community social cohesion during a large public housing and neighbourhood redevelopment: A mixed methods study. Societies 15. (5): 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15050140
PERRY, C. 1998 [1929]. The Neighbourhood Unit. Reprinted. London, Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
PETSIMERIS, P. 2018. Social and ethnic transformation of large social housing estates in Milan, Italy: From modernity to marginalisation. In Housing Estates in Europe: Perspectives on the Built Environment, Social Life and Policy. Eds.: HESS, D.B., TAMMARU, T. and VAN HAM, M., Cham, Springer, 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92813-5_12
POLKO, P. and KIMIC, K. 2022. Gender as a factor differentiating the perceptions of safety in urban parks. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 13. (3): 101608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.09.032
RASWOL, L.M. 2018. Promoting outdoor spaces design features to increase user satisfaction in a residential area: Duhok City as a case study. Academic Journal of Nawroz University 7. (3): 185–194. https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v7n3a222
SAMPSON, R.J., RAUDENBUSH, S.W. and EARLS, F. 1997. Neighbourhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277. (5328): 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918
SANDSTRÖM, I., ERICSSON, P. and HEDVALL, P. 2024. Gendered sustainability: Are public spaces designed for girls good for everyone? Examining female participation as a strategy for inclusive public space. Cities 149. 104906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104906
SENDI, R., AALBERS, M. and TRIGUEIRO, M. 2009. Public space in large housing estates. In Mass Housing in Europe. Multiple Faces of Development, Change and Response. Eds.: ROWLANDS, R., MUSTERD, S. and VAN KEMPEN, R., London, Palgrave Macmillan, 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274723_6
SENDI, R., ŠEME, A. and KERBLER, B. 2023. Housing satisfaction: A comparison between post-Second World War large housing estates and post-socialist multifamily residential neighbourhoods in Slovenia. Sustainability 15. (18): 13390. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813390
SEPE, M. 2025. Correction: Contemporary approaches to healthy and liveable public spaces: Proximity, flexibility, and diversification. Urban Design International 30. 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-025-00274-7
SOJA, E.W. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Oxford, Blackwell.
SÝKORA, L. and BOUZAROVSKI, S. 2012. Multiple transformations: Conceptualising the post-communist urban transition. Urban Studies 49. (1): 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010397402
SZABÓ, B. 2024. Old housing estates in the housing market of a post-socialist city: The case of Budapest. Geographia Polonica 97. (1): 47–63. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0268
TE BRAAK, P. and VAN TIENOVEN, T.P. 2025. Navigating the city: A systematic literature review on women’s perceived safety in urban public space. Cities 162. 105907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105907
VALENTINE, G. 1990. Women’s fear and the design of public space. Built Environment 16. (4): 288–303.
VAN KEMPEN, R., DEKKER, K., HALL, S. and TOSICS, I. (eds.) 2005. Restructuring Large Housing Estates in Europe: Restructuring and Resistance inside the Welfare. Bristol, Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781847421456
WARWICK, E. and LEES, L. 2022. Osmosis across defensible space: Observations and lessons from derives in London during COVID-19. Urban Geography 43. 810–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2022.2039435
WASSENBERG, F. 2018. Beyond an ugly appearance: Understanding the physical design and built environment of large housing estates. In Housing Estates in Europe: Perspectives on the Built Environment, Social Life and Policy. Eds.: HESS, D.B., TAMMARU, T. and VAN HAM, M., Cham, Springer, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92813-5_2
YATESA, A. and CECCATO, V. 2020. Individual and spatial dimensions of women’s fear of crime: A Scandinavian study case. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 44. (2): 277–292 https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2020.1719531
YUSSUF, S.O., JIBOYE, A.D., AGBABIAKA, H.I., ADEYEMI, T.E. and OKE, O.E. 2021. Users’ assessment of the relationship between housing quality and the conditions of residential outdoor spaces in Ilesa, Nigeria. Paper for West Africa Built Environment Research Conference (WABER), 9–11. August, 2021. Accra, Ghana.
ZYSK, E. 2024. Identification of determinants that reduce women’s safety and comfort in urban public spaces (UPS). Sustainability 16. (22): 10075. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210075
Other sources:
www.mbhindex.hu
www.otp.hu
Copyright (c) 2026 Kornelia Kissfazekas, Tamás Egedy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
