Forces of energy welfare in Central Europe: The Russian war in Ukraine as a game changer
Abstract
The Russian war in Ukraine has changed global geopolitical priorities and the policies of individual countries. The consequences of this ongoing war will be felt for decades to come, including the militarisation of states and the strengthening of political-military alliances. This article explores the effects of this conflict through the lens of energy welfare, which is used as an essential litmus test for the transforming economies of the Visegrad Group (V4) countries in Central Europe. Energy security and the energy transition have become critical topics, and energy security and its impact on social welfare affect the sensitive areas of policy choices that will determine the direction of development in this part of Europe. The V4 countries – Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary – illustrate a wide range of domestic and geopolitical orientations that place individual countries in different decision-making situations. The ideological and political forces determine the scope for achieving energy welfare and are, therefore, the subject of this article. Based on macroeconomic and survey data results, the article’s primary research query examines how the V4 countries’ reliance on Russian fossil fuels affects their political attitudes and societal perceptions of the conflict in Ukraine, and the implications for their energy security and welfare in the face of the European Green Deal efforts. The different strategies adopted by the four countries considered translate into energy transition pathways to a low carbon economy described in the European Green Deal and strategies to provide energy at a reasonable price at the expense of a coherent European policy towards Russian aggression.
References
ACEMOGLU, D. 2023. The end of democratic capitalism? How inequality and insecurity fueled a crisis in the West. Foreign Affairs July/August 2023.
ALMEIDA, D.V., KOLINJIVADI, V., FERRANDO, T., ROY, B., HERRERA, H., GONÇALVES, M.V. and VAN HECKEN, G. 2023. The “greening” of empire: The European Green Deal as the EU first agenda. Political Geography 105. 102925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102925
ANG, B.W., CHOONG, W.L. and NG, T.S. 2015. Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 42. 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.064
ANGENENDT, M. and KINSKI, L. 2023. Germany: Political developments and data in 2022. European Journal of Political Research Political Data Yearbook 62. (1): 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-8852.12406
ANTONAKAKIS, N., GUPTA, R., KOLLIAS, C. and PAPADAMOU, S. 2017. Geopolitical risks and the oil-stock nexus over 1899–2016. Finance Research Letters 23. 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.07.017
ASH, T.G. 2023. Postimperial Empire: How the war in Ukraine is transforming Europe. For-eign Affairs 102. (3): 64–75.
ASH, T.G., KRASTEV, I. and LEONARD, M. 2023. United West, divided from the rest: Global public opinion one year into Russia’s war on Ukraine. European Council on Foreign Relations. Policy Brief, 22 February 2023. 1–19.
BÄCKER, R. and RAK, J. 2022. Why did Putin go too far? The rationality of Vladimir Putin’s decision to begin a war with Ukraine. Society Register 6. (3): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2022.6.3.04
BARANOWSKI, M. 2019. The struggle for social welfare: Towards an emerging welfare sociol-ogy. Society Register 3. (2): 7–19. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2019.3.2.01
BARANOWSKI, M. 2022a. Nature-based social welfare and socially responsible consumption: Is circular economy a viable solution? In Dealing with Socially Responsible Consumers: Studies in Marketing. Ed.: BHATTACHARYYA, J., Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore, 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4457-4_3
BARANOWSKI, M. 2022b. Dialectic of Russia’s war in Ukraine: Between geopolitics and energy welfare. Society Register 6. (3): 7–18. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2022.6.3.01
BARANOWSKI, M. 2022c. Welfare over warfare? Russia’s war on Ukraine through the prism of Europe’s energy security. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 12. (5): 226–231. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.13415
BARANOWSKI, M. 2023a. The paradox of two wars in Ukraine: Between independence and the social welfare of others. World Affairs 186. (1): 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200221135190
BARANOWSKI, M. 2023b. Critical theory of the energy transformation: Sociology’s approach. Society Register 7. (4): 7–20. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2023.7.4.01
BAUEROVÁ, H. and VOŠTA, M. 2020. Multi-level governance and energy specifics of the V4 countries within the context of European integration. Politics in Central Europe 16. (2): 525–546. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2020-0022
BAYER, L. and CIENSKI, J. 2022. The not-so-fantastic 4: Central Europe’s divided Visegrad alliance. Politico 7 January 2022. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/central-europe-divided-visegrad-v4-alliance/
BAZILIAN, M.D. 2018. The mineral foundation of the energy transition. The Extractive Indus-tries and Society 5. (1): 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.12.002
BEHNASSI, M. and EL HAIBA, M. 2022. Implications of the Russia-Ukraine war for global food security. Nature Human Behaviour 6. 754–755. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01391-x
BEARE, M. 2018. The importance of energy security. In Oxford Policy Management. Oxford UK, OPM. Available at https://www.opml.co.uk/blog/importance-energy-security
BILAN, Y., MISHCHUK, H., SAMOLIUK, N. and YURCHYK, H. 2020. Impact of income distribu-tion on social and economic well-being of the state. Sustainability 12. (1): 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010429
BLUMENAU, B. 2022. Breaking with convention? Zeitenwende and the traditional pillars of German foreign policy. International Affairs 98. (6): 1895–1913. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac166
BOMPARD, E., CARPIGNANO, A., ERRIQUEZ, M., GROSSO, D., PESSION, M. and PROFUMO, F. 2017. National energy security assessment in a geopolitical perspective. Energy 130. 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.108
BORDOFF, J. and O’SULIVAN, M.L. 2023. The age of energy insecurity: How the fight for re-sources is upending geopolitics. Foreign Affairs 102. (3): 104–119.
BOUZAROVSKI, S. and PETROVA, S. 2015. A global perspective on domestic energy depriva-tion: Overcoming the energy poverty-fuel poverty binary. Energy Research & Social Science 10. 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.06.007
BOUZAROVSKI, S. and SIMCOCK, N. 2017. Spatializing energy justice. Energy Policy 107. 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.064
BOUZAROVSKI, S., SIMCOCK, N., THOMSON, H. and PETROVA, S. 2017. Introduction. In Energy Poverty and Vulnerability: A Global Perspective. Eds.: SIMCOCK, N., THOMSON, H., PETROVA, S. and BOUZAROVSKI, S., London, Routledge, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315231518-1
BUNDE, T. 2022. Lessons (to be) learned? Germany’s Zeitenwende and European security after the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Contemporary Security Policy 43. (3): 516–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2092820
CHEN, Y., JIANG, J., WANG, L. and WANG, R. 2023. Impact assessment of energy sanctions in geo-conflict: Russian-Ukrainian war. Energy Reports 9. 3082–3095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.124
CIENSKI, J. 2012. What’s the point of the Visegrad 4? Poland’s Sikorski speaks. Financial Times, July 5. 2012.
CUI, L., YUE, S., NGHIEM, X.-H. and DUAN, M. 2023. Exploring the risk and economic vulner-ability of global energy supply chain interruption in the context of Russo-Ukrainian war. Resources Policy 81. 103373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103373
DE JONG, M. 2023. Wind of change: The impact of REPowerEU policy reforms on gas securi-ty. Policy Studies. Taylor and Francis online. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2024.2302442
DE JONG, M. 2024. Tracing the downfall of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline. WIREs Energy and Environment 13. (1): e502. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.502
DICKINSON, P. 2023. New Polish PM Donald Tusk vows “full mobilization” of West to help Ukraine. Atlantic Council online. 12 December 2023. Available at https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/region/poland/page/25/
DOBBINS, A. 2022. System Analysis of the Significance of Energy Poverty on Household Energy Use and Emissions in Germany. Stuttgart, Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Ener-gieanwendung.
ECOSOC 2016. Progress towards the sustainable development goals: Report of the Secretary-General. New York, United Nations Economic and Social Council.
Eurobarometer 2022. (98.1 | EB042)
European Commission 2022. In focus: Reducing the EU’s dependence on imported fossil fuels. Brussels, European Commis-sion. Available at https://commission.europa.eu/news/focus-reducing-eus-dependence-imported-fossil-fuels-2022-04-20_en
Eurostat 2023. Share of primary production by energy source, 2021. Luxembourg, Eurostat.
EYL-MAZZEGA, M.-A. and MATHIEU, C. 2020. The European Union and the energy transition. In The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition. Eds.: HAFNER, M. and TAGLIAPIETRA, S., Cham, Springer International Publishing, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39066-2_2
GIELEN, D. and LYONS, M. 2022. Critical Materials for the Energy Transition: Rare Earth Elements. Abu Dhabi, International Renewable Energy Agency.
GORYASHKO, S. 2024. Ukraine to Slovakia’s Fico: No, we won’t give up land to Russia. Politico, 22 January 2024. Available at https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine-to-fico-piss-off/
GRAFF, M., CARLEY, S. and PIROG, M. 2019. A review of the environmental policy literature from 2014 to 2017 with a closer look at the energy justice field. Policy Studies Journal 47. (1): 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12316
GROSSMANN, K. and KAHLHEBER, A. 2017. Energy poverty in an intersectional perspective: On multiple deprivation, discriminatory systems, and the effects of policies. In Energy Poverty and Vulnerability: A Global Perspective. Eds.: SIMCOCK, N., THOMSON, H., PETROVA, S. and BOUZAROVSKI, S., London, Routledge, 12–32.
HANDL, V., NIGRIN, T. and MEJSTŘÍK, M. 2023. Turnabout or continuity? The German Zeitenwende and the reaction of the V4 countries to it. Journal of European Integration 45. (3): 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2190110
HELFERICH, J. 2023. The (false) promise of Germany’s Zeitenwende. European View 22. (1): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/17816858231157556
IACOBUTA, G.I. and ONBARGI, A.F. 2022. The European Green Deal and the war in Ukraine: Addressing crises in the short and long term. European Think Tanks Group, 22 July 2022. Available at https://ettg.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/The-European-Green-Deal-and-the-war-in-Ukraine.pdf
KAMMEN, D.M. 2020. Defeating energy poverty: Invest in scalable solutions for the poor. In Health of People, Health of Planet and Our Responsibility: Climate Change, Air Pollution and Health. Eds.: AL-DELAIMY, W.K., RAMANATHAN, V. and SÁNCHEZ SORONDO, M., Cham, Springer International Publishing, 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31125-4_26
KASPEROWICZ, R., BILAN, Y. and ŠTREIMIKIENĖ, D. 2020. The renewable energy and economic growth nexus in Euro-pean countries. Sustainable Development 28. (5): 1086–1093. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2060
KLITKOU, A., PLUCIŃSKI, P., BARANOWSKI, M. and OTTO, I.M. 2023. Calling energy inequali-ties into the transition agenda. Energy Research & Social Science 101. 103144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103144
KUCHARCZYK, J. and MESEŽNIKOV, G. 2015. The Visegrad countries have a stake in the suc-cess of a pro-European Ukraine. In Diverging Voices, Converging Policies: The Visegrad States’ Reactions to the Russia-Ukraine Conflict. Eds.: KUCHARCZYK, J. and MESEŽNIKOV, G., War-saw, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, 9–12.
LAES, E., BOMBAERTS, G. and SPAHN, A. 2023. Towards a pragmatic and pluralist framework for energy justice. Philosophy & Technology 36. (3): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00654-3
LINDHOLM, A. and RAPELI, L. 2023. Is the unhappy citizen a populist citizen? Linking sub-jective well-being to populist and nativist attitudes. European Political Science Review 15. (3): 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000583
MADER, M. and SCHOEN, H. 2023. No Zeitenwende (yet): Early assessment of German public opinion toward foreign and defense policy after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 64. 525–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-023-00463-5
MESEŽNIKOV, G. 2022. Stance of the V4 countries towards Russian military agression against Ukraine. Warsaw, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, 20 December 2022. Available at https://cz.boell.org/en/2022/12/13/postoje-krajin-v4-voci-ruskej-agresii-proti-ukrajine
MIDDLEMISS, L. 2020. Energy poverty: Understanding and addressing systemic inequalities. In Inequality and Energy: How Extremes of Wealth and Poverty in High Income Countries Affect CO2 Emissions and Access to Energy. Ed.: GALVIN, R., London, Academic Press, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817674-0.00005-9
NATHWANI, J. and KAMMEN, D.M. 2019. Affordable energy for humanity: A global move-ment to support universal clean energy access. Proceedings of the IEEE 107. (9): 1780–1789. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2918758
PIASECKI, A. 2023. European Green Deal + Poland + hydroelectric plants = Future? Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 72. (4): 399–414. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.72.4.5
SÁGI, M. 2022. The geographical scales of fear: spatiality of emotions, emotional spatialities. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 71. (1): 55–65. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.71.1.4
SCHUNZ, S. 2022. The ‘European Green Deal’ – a paradigm shift? Transformations in the European Union’s sustainability meta-discourse. Political Research Exchange 4 (1): 2085121. https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2085121
SIDDI, M. 2022. The partnership that failed: EU-Russia relations and the war in Ukraine. Journal of European Integration 44. (6): 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2109651
SOVACOOL, B.K. and DWORKIN, M. 2012. Overcoming the global injustices of energy poverty. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 54. (5): 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2012.711669
STREECK, W. 2023. Reflections on the particular and the universal: unity and diversity in social life and social theory. Society Register 7. (2): 7–20. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2023.7.2.01
TOLLEFSON, J. 2022. What the war in Ukraine means for energy, climate and food. Nature 604. 232–233. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00969-9
UTAMA, M.A. and RAMADHANI, A. 2022. Rethinking the role of Visegrad Group in the EU enlargement process. Intermestic: Journal of International Studies 7. (1): 78–103. https://doi.org/10.24198/intermestic.v7n1.5
UWISHEMA, O., SUJANAMULK, B., ABBASS, M., FAWAZ, R., JAVED, A., ABOUDIB, K., MAHMOUD, A., OLUYEMISI, A. and ONYEAKA, H. 2022. Russia-Ukraine conflict and COVID-19: A double burden for Ukraine’s healthcare system and a concern for global citizens. Postgrad-uate Medical Journal 98. (1162): 569–571. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2022-141895
VEZZONI, R. 2023. The REPowerEU Plan and the inconsistencies of European Union energy policy. Energy Research & Social Science 101. 103–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103134
WANG, Y., BOURI, E., FAREEED, Z. and DAI, Y. 2022. Geopolitical risk and the systemic risk in the commodity markets under the war in Ukraine. Finance Research Letters 49. 103066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103066
Copyright (c) 2024 Mariusz Baranowski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
